Reading the Azuchi Town Ordinance · 01
Nobunaga’s Free Market Also Forced Merchants to Stop in Azuchi
The first provision of the 1577 ordinance removes guild privileges, services, and public dues. The second redirects highway merchants into the castle town and makes them lodge there. Exemption and compulsion are adjacent parts of one policy.
A fresh translation
Since this place has been ordered to be a free market,
all guild privileges, services, and public dues are entirely exempted.
Original text
一、当所中為楽市被仰付之上者、
諸座・諸役・諸公事等悉免許事
Terms in the two provisions
- Free market (rakuichi, 楽市)
The document explains the designation through the exemptions that follow. It is not a general definition of economic liberty. - Guilds or guild privileges (za, 座)
Corporate and privileged arrangements governing particular trades or production. The plural “various za” is one item in a wider list. - Services and public dues (諸役・諸公事)
Obligations imposed on people or property. The exact scope is not itemized in these lines. - Upper Highway (上海道)
Identified by the archive as the Nakasendō route. Merchants are told to stop using it as a way to pass Azuchi. - Lodge (寄宿)
To stay overnight. The construction 可寄宿 is prescriptive: they are to lodge, not merely permitted to do so.
The document begins by offering an advantage
The phrase “free market” now sounds like a complete program. In the ordinance it is the beginning of a sentence. Because Azuchi has been designated a rakuichi, the provision says, various guilds, services, and public dues are entirely exempted. The practical content lies in what residents and traders will no longer owe.
The list is broader than the familiar phrase “abolition of the guilds.” Za comes first, but services and public obligations follow. The final word kotogotoku, “entirely,” gives the announcement reach. It advertises Azuchi as a place where a cluster of inherited or imposed burdens will not apply.
The sentence does not specify every trade affected, identify every collector whose claim disappears, or show how the order was enforced. It is a grant stated at the level of a town charter. To measure its implementation, we would need other records. What the surviving text gives directly is the offer: entry into the town comes with exemption.
The next provision redirects traffic
The second provision addresses a different population. Its subject is not people already settled beneath Azuchi Castle but merchants “in transit,” moving up and down a highway. Nobunaga’s order changes their route.
They are to cease passing along the Upper Highway and must come to lodge in the town. “Whether traveling up or down” closes an obvious distinction between directions. Azuchi is not presented simply as an optional stop attractive because of the exemptions. The ordinance attempts to place it inside the required movement of commerce.
An overnight stay creates more than foot traffic. It consumes lodging, keeps carriers and information in town for a period, and creates opportunities for exchange. Those are reasonable effects to infer, though the provision supplies no count of guests and no account book. The important textual point is simpler: the government did not only reduce barriers inside Azuchi; it actively drew the highway toward it.
Compulsion for travelers, discretion for cargo
The provision adds a qualification after ordering the merchants to lodge. Whether their goods are loaded or unloaded is left to the owner. The person must enter and stay; the cargo need not be put into the local market.
This distinction prevents two easy summaries. The order is not pure freedom of route, because travelers are compelled to stop. It is also not a command that every passing merchant sell at Azuchi, because handling the load remains the owner’s decision.
The boundary is visible in the grammar. Lodging receives the “shall” construction. Loading and unloading end with “according to the owner.” One clause controls movement and time while leaving a commercial choice open. The ordinance manufactures an occasion for trade without prescribing that every occasion become a transaction.
That combination is more informative than attaching a modern label such as deregulation or state planning. Both labels capture a piece of the policy and lose another. The text removes obligations, redirects people, and preserves a limited choice over goods.
A charter for making a castle town
The two provisions become clearer when read as consecutive parts of town building. Exemption gives merchants and residents a reason to enter. Required lodging supplies a flow of people who might otherwise bypass the settlement. One works on the cost of being in Azuchi; the other works on the route by which people reach it.
The remaining eleven provisions confirm that the ordinance is not a single-issue proclamation. They address exemption from construction service and post-horse duties, responsibility for fires and offenders, unwitting purchase of stolen property, protection from debt cancellation, treatment of new residents, quarrels and coercive purchases, official entry into houses, household obligations, and the location of horse trading.
Together they define protections, responsibilities, and points of control for a new political center. The free market clause is the famous doorway into the document, but it belongs to a larger urban order. A market needed residents, transit, predictable liability, security, and rules about who could make demands inside the town.
What “free” meant in these lines
The freedom stated in provision 1 is freedom from named burdens. It does not declare an unrestricted right to trade anywhere, travel by any route, or ignore the castle lord’s commands. Provision 2 immediately demonstrates the limit.
That does not make the word rakuichi fraudulent. Medieval and early modern privileges often created one protected space by making exceptions to obligations that applied elsewhere. The advantage could be real precisely because authority declared and defended it. The same authority could then regulate access to the protected space.
Reading exemption and command together also keeps us from turning policy into personality. The document cannot tell us that Nobunaga loved freedom or disliked it. It shows him using exemption and compulsion as tools directed at the prosperity and concentration of the town below his castle.
Why the original document matters
This text is not known only through a later chronicle. Omihachiman City preserves the original scroll, measuring 41.8 by 148.4 centimeters. Thirteen provisions run across three joined sheets, followed by the date and Nobunaga’s red seal. The digital viewer lets readers compare the handwriting with a modern diplomatic transcription.
That source distinction matters. The Shinchō Kōki is indispensable for the sequence of Nobunaga’s career, and it describes the building and life of Azuchi in narrative form. The selected words here come instead from an instrument addressed to “the town below Azuchi.” They preserve what was granted and ordered in the form in which the authority announced it.
The physical document also resists a slogan. “Free market” occupies only the opening. Fire, crime, migration, household service, and horse sales follow on the same scroll. The object was made to govern a town, not to provide a quotation for a later theory of economics.
Limits of the first two provisions
They do not prove that every guild privilege disappeared in practice. An order and its implementation are different kinds of evidence. Nor do they prove that every traveler obeyed the lodging rule. Evasion and enforcement require records beyond the ordinance.
They do not establish that Nobunaga invented the rakuichi-rakuza policy. Earlier commands associated with free markets survive, including other examples connected with Nobunaga. What distinguishes the Azuchi ordinance is the range of its thirteen provisions and the survival of this original document.
Finally, the lines do not describe a modern national market. Their world is a castle town, privileged associations, personal services, public dues, highway carriers, and a lord’s jurisdiction. Similarities to later economic policy can prompt questions, but they should not erase those institutions.
Read the policy as a pair
Provision 1 exempts guilds, services, and public dues. Provision 2 directs highway merchants to lodge in Azuchi while leaving the loading and unloading of cargo to them. Each changes a different part of commercial life.
Separating them produces two opposing myths: Nobunaga as an uncomplicated champion of free enterprise, or Nobunaga as a ruler whose “freedom” was only coercion. The document supports neither simplification. He offered an unusually broad release from burdens and used command to channel movement into the favored town.
The first two provisions are short enough to read together. That is their advantage. Exemption attracts, required lodging concentrates, and discretion over cargo leaves space for choice. Azuchi’s free market appears not as the absence of government but as a town deliberately assembled through several different uses of authority.
Source
“Ordinance for the Town Below Azuchi” (安土山下町中掟書), dated the sixth month of Tenshō 5 (1577), original held by Omihachiman City. The wording was checked against the original scroll in the Omihachiman City Historical Romance Digital Archive and the archive’s diplomatic transcription, reading text, and summary. Catalog dimensions, date, and rights information are also available through the National Diet Library Search record. Punctuation, interpuncts, and the three editorial line breaks have been added for readability.